Employee handbooks are not legally mandated. However, a good employee handbook sets the tone for a workplace. It should set forth company policies and other information employees need to know. Likewise, it should include the consequences for violations of the handbook provisions.
A company’s employment policies frequently become an issue of interest in employment-related legal disputes. While it may not be “unlawful” for a company to ignore its own policies, a departure from the rules could indicate unlawful conduct. Typically, the allegations will involve claims of discrimination or retaliation based on the different application of a policy or rule to particular employees. To avoid such allegations, employers should set out clear policies and adhere to them consistently with everyone.
When a legal issue arises, employers often regret not documenting conduct and/or performance issues with employees. Whether the company faces an unemployment claim, EEOC Charge, lawsuit, or any other legal challenge, it is difficult to defend against an accusation when there is no evidence of the employee’s bad behavior or poor work performance.
In addition, employment claims that escalate to an administrative agency or court can take years to resolve. In the interim, key witnesses can disappear. If that happens, documentation may be the main (or only) evidence upon which a company has to rely to defend against liability.
Federal law places specific requirements on the way employers classify employees for purposes of pay. Only certain types of jobs are “exempt” from overtime, based on criteria set out under federal law. For this reason, an employer cannot simply label a position as “salaried” to avoid paying overtime. Likewise, not all employees can be forced to work unlimited hours a week for a set amount of money. Instead, the job duties must be analyzed to see whether the position falls within an exemption category.
Likewise, an employer cannot simply label someone as an “independent contractor” and issue them an IRS Form 1099 (versus a W-2). There are specific legal criteria to meet before making that designation.
An employer must pay overtime to non-exempt employees (hourly or salaried) for any worked hours exceeding 40 in a particular workweek.
TIP – Do NOT confuse this requirement by thinking that overtime is only paid if an employee works more than 80 hours in a 2-week pay period! You must look at the hours for each workweek.
Similarly, an employer cannot avoid paying overtime by asking employees to work “off the clock.” Likewise, an employee’s already worked hours cannot be shifted into a different workweek.
Additionally, employers must keep track of the work hours for all non-exempt employees (including salaried). If a pay claim arises and there are no records, it will be extremely difficult to defeat the allegations. In fact, the company could face liability for the unpaid overtime, plus liquidated damages, as well as the employee’s attorneys’ fees. Of course, the company also bears the expense of paying attorneys to defend the allegations!
It is important to investigate employee complaints to determine whether they are legitimate. While many issues may not implicate legal exposure, you never know.
Employment discrimination claims involve accusations that an employer unlawfully subjected an employee to adverse treatment based on one or more of their legally protected characteristics. Those traits include race, age, gender, disability, pregnancy, national origin, religion, and sexual identity/orientation. Typically, these types of claims allege that the employer treated another employee more favorably under similar circumstances.
Companies should take a proactive approach to safety issues. For example, it is important to maintain vehicles and equipment. Likewise, if there are any chemicals or other potential hazards in the workplace or used at job locations, make sure items are properly secured and stored. Additionally, it is critical to have necessary personal protective equipment (“PPE”) and safety equipment for all employees who need it. Also, make sure that employees hold valid licenses, if required. Not addressing safety matters exposes your company to workers compensation claims, OSHA investigations, and third-party liability.
Multiple laws can be implicated when an employee identifies a health issue:
Additionally, the ADA requires employers to make “reasonable accommodations” for individuals with disabilities. Employers are required to engage in an “interactive process” with disabled employees to find a suitable reasonable accommodation, if one is needed.
This law also provides rules dictating when an employer can request medical information or require an employee to undergo a medical exam or inquiry.
Certainly, the HR department should be able to adequately handle certain “routine” matters (separation paperwork, investigating complaints, responding to unemployment claims where an employee quit, etc.). However, it is not advisable to have HR address any contested legal issues with a current or former employee.
To avoid these unintended consequences, it is wise to retain an experienced employment attorney early in the process, as it can save time and money in the long run!
Not many people “want” to call a lawyer. However, spending a little upfront to get advice could save you from a legal claim that could put your business in financial jeopardy. Similarly, it is essential to have someone to call when you are not sure how to handle a situation. Call an experienced employment attorney with your questions. More importantly, if you receive a demand letter, lawsuit, EEOC charge or other notice of a claim, you should immediately have a lawyer evaluate the situation. An employment attorney can assess the potential exposure and to avoid missing any deadlines. Likewise, unemployment claims should not be ignored, as successful claims will increase your business expenses and can be used against the company in other legal proceedings.
This web site (including links, blogs or other content) is provided for informational purposes only and is not to be considered as legal advice. Any interaction through this web site, including but not limited to any comments or the submission of a consultation request, does not create an expressed or implied attorney-client relationship.